The North Korean famine — officially termed the "Arduous March" in state propaganda — killed an estimated 240,000 to 3.5 million people. It was caused by floods, drought, the collapse of Soviet aid, and regime mismanagement. Crucially, the regime maintained food exports and continued to supply the military and party elite throughout. The Public Distribution System (PDS), which had controlled all food access since the 1950s, effectively collapsed in rural areas. Survival required illegal markets, foraging and bartering household goods.
Multiple documented accounts — including testimony from his former personal chef, a Japanese national who worked for Kim Jong-il for over a decade — describe elaborate dining rituals at the top of the regime: a wine cellar of over 10,000 bottles, live seafood flown in weekly from Japan, a dedicated food safety officer whose sole role was pre-tasting every dish. The phrase "this is how you prepare food for a god" is drawn from composite defector testimonies about the culture of quasi-divine reverence surrounding the Kim family.
The PDS assigned rations by political loyalty and occupation. Military officers and party members received the largest allocations. Those classified as "hostile class" — with family members who had defected, been imprisoned, or been deemed politically unreliable — received the smallest. During the famine, daily rations in some rural areas fell below 100 grams of grain per person.
North Korea is the ideal teaching context for passive reporting: almost everything about the regime is alleged, claimed or disputed — independent verification is near-impossible by definition.
It is alleged that Kim Jong-il's chef flew in live seafood from Japan every week.
The daily ration is reported to have fallen below one hundred grams during the famine.
It has been claimed that the regime maintained food exports throughout the famine years.
Board both patterns and ensure students can produce both freely.
Never before had a state so systematically weaponised food as a tool of political control.
Not only did the rationing system determine what people ate, but it also determined their social rank.
Rarely does a defector speak openly — the fear outlasts the border crossing.
So deeply ingrained was the ideology of food-as-loyalty that hunger alone could not dislodge it.
· G1: It is said that every official knew their rank from what appeared on their table / It is reported that first-category rations included meat / it is alleged that aid was redirected
· G2: If the international community had applied more sustained pressure, the outcome might look different today
· G3: What kept people silent was not ignorance / What I know is this / It is the presence of someone else's surplus
· G4: Despite international food aid arriving from 1996 / Despite what was happening outside
· G5: It was imperative that we not speak of it
· G6: Never before had I understood so clearly / Not only did ordinary citizens lack food, but they also lacked any means to speak
Ex 2 (rewrite): 1. It is alleged/claimed that food aid was redirected to the military / Food aid is alleged to have been redirected (G1) 2. Not only did the rationing system determine food allocation, but it also determined social status (G6) 3. What the famine demonstrated was not merely agricultural failure but the deliberate weaponisation of scarcity / It was not agriculture but political choice that determined who ate (G3) 4. It is imperative that aid distribution be monitored by independent observers / that no ration be withheld without accountability (G5) 5. If the regime had not redirected food aid, fewer people might have died / the famine might not have reached such catastrophic scale (G2)
Ex 3 (concession): 1. Despite / In spite of 2. Even though / Although / While 3. Nevertheless / Nonetheless 4. While / Although 5. despite / in spite of
Ex 4 (subjunctive errors): 1. BE monitored 2. BE redirected 3. HAVE access 4. BE distributed 5. REMAIN confidential
Ex 5 (inversion): 1. Never before had a state so systematically weaponised food as a tool of political control. 2. Not only did the rationing system determine what people ate, but it also determined their social rank. 3. Rarely does a defector speak openly about what they witnessed — the fear outlasts the border crossing. 4. So deeply ingrained was the ideology of food-as-loyalty that hunger alone could not dislodge it. 5. Not until Mr. Park crossed the frozen river did he eat food that no one had decided he deserved.
Task 2: rank/table / first-category / meat+vegetables / corn husks / imperative/not speak / ignorance/silence/surplus / sustained pressure/different / frozen river/deserved
"This Is How You Prepare Food for a God"
Vocabulary
VocabularyMatch each word on the left with the phrase it most naturally collocates with on the right. More than one answer may be possible — choose the most natural pairing.
2. widespread
3. state
4. mass
5. food
6. political
b. deprivation
c. surplus
d. famine
e. ration
f. ideology
Use the words from Part A. Each word is used once.
Grammar
GrammarThe language of claims that cannot be independently verified — essential for writing about closed states.
It is alleged that Kim Jong-il's chef flew in live seafood from Japan every week.
The daily ration is reported to have fallen below one hundred grams during the famine.
It has been claimed that the regime maintained food exports throughout the famine years.
Aid is said to have been redirected to the military before reaching civilian populations.
Pattern 1: It is/has been alleged/reported/claimed THAT + clause
Pattern 2: Subject + is/was said/reported/alleged TO + infinitive or TO HAVE + pp
Historical failures and their present consequences — the grammar of "what if".
If the regime hadn't redirected food aid in the 1990s, millions of people might still be alive.
If international monitoring had been accepted, the scale of the famine might not be so disputed today.
If independent markets hadn't emerged illegally, the death toll might have been far higher still.
Structure: If + past perfect → would/might/could + bare infinitive (present) or + have + pp (past consequence)
Isolating the element that carries the analytical weight — precision in political writing.
It is not hunger alone that breaks a population — it is the knowledge that others feast.
It was not agricultural failure but political choice that determined who ate and who did not.
What the famine revealed was not a failure of nature but a failure of political will.
What kept people silent was not ignorance — it was the understanding that silence was survival.
It-clefts: It was/is [X] that/who… · Wh-clefts: What [X] is/was/reveals…
Acknowledging competing facts — the mark of measured analytical writing.
Despite international food aid arriving from 1996, distribution remained under state control.
Even though the regime acknowledged food shortages, it refused independent monitoring.
The illegal markets saved lives. Nevertheless, participation in them carried the risk of arrest.
While some aid reached civilian populations, a significant portion was reportedly redirected.
Institutional demands and imperatives — the language of state and humanitarian obligation.
It was imperative that every dish be tasted before it reached the leader's table.
Aid organisations demanded that distribution be independently monitored.
It is essential that food aid reach civilian populations without military diversion.
The committee insisted that all ration records be made available to investigators.
Structure: that + subject + BASE FORM · Triggers: imperative / essential / vital / demand / require / insist
Rhetorical force in documentary, journalistic and political writing.
Never before had a state so systematically weaponised food as a tool of political control.
Not only did the rationing system determine what people ate, but it also determined their social rank.
Rarely does a defector speak openly — the fear outlasts the border crossing.
So deeply ingrained was the ideology of food-as-loyalty that hunger alone could not dislodge it.
Triggers: Not only · Rarely · Never (before) · So + adj · Not until · Seldom → invert auxiliary + subject
Keep the meaning. Use the structure in brackets.
Use: despite · even though · nevertheless · while · in spite of
Reading
ReadingGo back to the documentary transcript. Find one example of each structure G1–G6 and underline it. Write the line or phrase here.
Write full sentences. Use advanced grammar where possible.
Listening
ListeningMr. Park — Key Points
Find one example of each in the listening. Write the exact words you heard.
Speaking
SpeakingDiscuss in groups of three. Use all six grammar structures and at least four vocabulary words from Handout 1 in your discussion.
G1: "It is alleged/reported that…" · G2: "If… had… might still…" · G3: "What this reveals is… / It was not X but Y that…"
G4: "Despite… / Even though… / Nevertheless…" · G5: "It is imperative that… be…" · G6: "Never before had… / Not only did…"
Writing
WritingOption A — Analytical Essay: "The North Korean famine was not a natural disaster — it was a political event. Discuss."
Option B — Position Paper: Draft a position paper for an international humanitarian organisation arguing that food aid to authoritarian states must be subject to independent monitoring. Address the sovereignty objection directly.
Option C — Editorial: Write an editorial responding to Mr. Park's testimony. Consider what his account reveals about the relationship between food, power and human dignity.
Word count: 120–150 words
G1 Passive Rep G2 Mixed Cond G3 Cleft G4 Concession G5 Subjunctive G6 Inversion
"It is alleged/reported that… [G1] / It was not X but Y that… / What the famine revealed was… [G3]"
"If food aid had been monitored, fewer people might have died… [G2]"
"Despite international pressure… / Even though… nevertheless… [G4]"
"It is imperative that aid distribution be… [G5] / Never before had… / Not only did… [G6]"

