Daylight Saving Time was first proposed seriously by New Zealand entomologist George Vernon Hudson in 1895 (who wanted more daylight for insect collecting) and implemented nationally by Germany in 1916 as a wartime energy-saving measure. Britain followed days later. By 1918 most of Europe and North America had adopted it. The original rationale — saving coal by reducing the need for artificial lighting in the evening — may have had some validity in an era of incandescent bulbs and coal fires. In the age of LED lighting, always-on electronics and air conditioning (which consumes more electricity in warm DST evenings than lighting saves), the energy argument has largely collapsed.
The spring transition (losing one hour) is associated with measurable short-term increases in: (1) cardiac events — it is reported that heart attacks increase by approximately 24% in the days following the spring transition; (2) road traffic accidents — it is claimed that accident rates rise by 6–8% in the week following the spring clock change; (3) workplace injuries and errors. The mechanism is sleep deprivation combined with social jet lag — the misalignment between internal circadian time and social/work schedules. Interestingly, the autumn transition (gaining an hour) shows smaller and shorter-lived health benefits, suggesting the circadian system adapts asymmetrically.
The economic case for DST is complex and contested. Retail and outdoor leisure industries (golf, barbecue equipment, gardening) benefit from extended evening daylight. Financial markets experience disruption because European and American clocks change on different weekends, creating two weeks each year of misaligned trading hours. The golf lobby in the USA specifically campaigned to extend DST — and succeeded in 1986 and again in 2005. It is reported that the golf industry's lobbying added a month to US DST. The energy saving argument has been largely debunked by modern studies.
Migratory birds navigate partly by day length (photoperiod) — a cue that is unaffected by clock changes. Farmers, whose livestock operate on solar time, face two weeks of disrupted feeding and milking schedules twice a year. Some studies suggest that DST may affect bird breeding season timing and insect-pollinator synchrony, though the evidence is still emerging.
The EU voted in 2018 to abolish DST — but the implementation has been indefinitely delayed because member states cannot agree on which permanent time to keep. Countries in the west of each time zone (Spain, France, Poland) prefer permanent summer time (permanent DST); countries in the east (Finland, Estonia) prefer permanent winter time (permanent standard time). Without coordination, abolition creates internal market disruption. The same problem stalled US reform: the Sunshine Protection Act passed the US Senate unanimously in 2022 but was blocked in the House.
All eight idioms connect directly to DST:
· turn back the clock → literally what happens each autumn; metaphorically, the debate about abolishing DST and "going back" to permanent standard time
· around the clock → 24-hour society; relevant to the debate about whether DST is still needed in an economy that operates around the clock
· time is money → Benjamin Franklin's argument (he proposed synchronising to daylight in 1784); the economic case for DST
· out of sync → the core chronobiological problem: DST puts social clocks out of sync with solar and biological clocks
· burn the candle at both ends → the sleep deprivation argument; also ironic — DST was originally about saving candles
· against the clock → the political urgency of reform campaigns; also EU's failed reform timeline
· in the long run → the long-term health consequences vs short-term disruption of reform
· lose track of time → the literal confusion DST creates; metaphorically, how institutions have lost track of why DST exists
· G1: It is widely reported that the spring hour costs European economies billions / It is claimed it was introduced to save candles / It is reported that the spring transition is associated with a 24% increase in cardiac events
· G2: If the EU had managed to implement its 2018 abolition vote, the coordination problem would have been worth resolving / If the health evidence had been given the same political weight as the lobbies, DST would have been abolished long ago
· G3: It is not the clock change itself that causes the most lasting damage — it is the misalignment / What the chronobiology unanimously recommends is permanent standard time
· G4: Despite compelling health evidence, the reform debate is being held hostage by a second-order question
· G5: It is imperative that policymakers be honest about who benefits from each option
· G6: Rarely has a single policy intervention so consistently disrupted the sleep of an entire population / Not only do European and American clocks shift on different weekends, but the disruption compounds
· Idioms: out of sync · against the clock · burn the candle at both ends · lose track of time · turn back the clock · in the long run
Part C gap-fill: 1. out of sync 2. in the long run 3. turn back the clock 4. lose track of time 5. time is money 6. burn the candle at both ends 7. against the clock 8. around the clock
Ex 2 (rewrite): 1. It is reported that the spring clock transition is associated with a 24% increase in cardiac events / The spring transition is reported to be associated with a 24% increase in cardiac events (G1) 2. Not only does the spring transition increase road accident rates, but it also raises the incidence of workplace injuries and medical errors in the days that follow (G6) 3. It is not the one-hour clock change itself that causes lasting harm — it is the weeks of misalignment between social time and solar time that follow / What drives the health costs of DST is not the disruption of a single night's sleep but the chronic misalignment that persists afterwards (G3) 4. It is imperative that any transition away from DST be coordinated internationally / that no member state adopt a permanent clock unilaterally without agreement from its neighbours (G5) 5. If the EU had implemented its 2018 abolition vote, the coordination problem would have been resolved by now / European financial markets might not experience two weeks of misaligned trading hours each year (G2)
Ex 3 (concession): 1. Despite / In spite of 2. Even though / Although / While 3. Nevertheless / Nonetheless 4. While / Although 5. despite / in spite of
Ex 4 (subjunctive): 1. BE coordinated 2. BE required 3. HAVE 4. BE abolished 5. REMAIN
Ex 5 (inversion): 1. Rarely has a policy so thoroughly outlived its original purpose while remaining so politically difficult to remove. 2. Not only does the spring clock change deprive millions of an hour of sleep, but it also increases cardiovascular and accident risk for days afterwards. 3. Never before has a public health intervention been blocked so consistently by a second-order political disagreement about implementation. 4. So deeply embedded is Daylight Saving Time in commercial culture that even governments with clear evidence of its harm find it politically costly to abolish. 5. Not until European governments agree on which permanent time to adopt will DST reform be possible.
Task 2: out of sync / social jet lag / misalignment / solar time / western / darker / Rarely / 2018 abolition / financial markets / two-week / against the clock / coordination / 24% / cardiac / second-order / permanent standard time / retail / in the long run / permanent summer / schoolchildren / darker / burn the candle / lose track / health / golf / turn back the clock
Daylight Saving Time
Vocabulary
VocabularyThis is the phrase people use to remember what to do with their clocks. Look at the diagram and answer the questions below.
You lose 1 hour of sleep
"Summer time" begins
You gain 1 hour of sleep
"Winter time" returns
Answer: ___________________________________________________________________
Answer: ___________________________________________________________________
Use the words from Part A. Each word is used once.
Idioms
IdiomsEvery idiom in this lesson connects to the Daylight Saving Time debate — literally, scientifically or politically. As you read each one, think: which aspect of the debate does it describe?
2. lose track of time
3. around the clock
4. out of sync
5. in the long run
6. burn the candle at both ends
7. turn back the clock
8. against the clock
b. to become unaware of how much time has passed
c. not in agreement or correct alignment
d. with very little time available; under pressure
e. over a long period; considered in the long term
f. to exhaust yourself through overwork and poor sleep
g. continuously, without stopping
h. time has financial value and should not be wasted
Fill in the gap with the correct idiom. Change the grammatical form where necessary.
Grammar
GrammarFor contested policy claims — essential when citing studies and attributing arguments.
It is widely reported that the spring clock transition is associated with a 24% increase in cardiac events.
Daylight Saving Time is claimed to save energy — a claim that most recent research has failed to support.
It has been reported that the US golf industry spent millions lobbying Congress to extend DST — and succeeded twice.
Pattern 1: It is/has been reported/claimed/suggested THAT + clause
Pattern 2: Subject + is said/reported/claimed TO + inf or TO HAVE + pp
The counterfactual history of DST — past decisions and their present consequences.
If the EU had implemented its 2018 abolition vote, European financial markets might not experience two weeks of misaligned trading hours each year.
If the health evidence had been weighted equally with commercial lobbying, DST might have been abolished decades ago.
If DST had never been introduced, the case for adopting it today would be virtually unanswerable — but inertia protects bad policies.
Structure: If + past perfect → would/might/could + bare infinitive (present) or + have + pp (past result)
Identifying the real cause of harm — correcting the "it's just one hour" misconception.
It is not the one-hour clock change that causes lasting damage — it is the weeks of misalignment between social time and solar time that follow.
It was not energy saving that extended US DST in 1986 — it was golf and barbecue lobby funding.
What chronobiology unanimously recommends is permanent standard time — keeping the winter clock year-round.
What blocks DST reform is not a lack of evidence but a failure of political coordination between countries.
It-clefts: It is/was [X] that/who… · Wh-clefts: What [X] is/was/reveals…
Acknowledging opposing arguments while maintaining the central position.
Despite compelling health evidence, DST reform has stalled because commercial interests are better organised than public health advocates.
Even though the EU voted to abolish DST in 2018, implementation has been indefinitely delayed by political disagreement.
Permanent summer time would bring real benefits for retail and tourism. Nevertheless, the chronobiological evidence strongly supports permanent standard time.
While the autumn transition generates a mild short-term benefit, it is insufficient to compensate for the spring transition's costs.
Policy demands and institutional requirements — what reform must look like.
It is imperative that any transition away from DST be coordinated internationally to avoid fragmenting the single market.
Chronobiologists have insisted that permanent standard time be adopted, not permanent summer time.
It is essential that school start times be considered alongside any DST reform, as dark mornings directly affect adolescent learning.
Structure: that + subject + BASE FORM · Triggers: imperative / essential / vital / demand / insist / recommend
Rhetorical emphasis in policy commentary, documentary writing and debate.
Rarely has a policy so thoroughly outlived its original purpose while remaining so politically difficult to remove.
Not only does the spring transition increase road accidents, but it also raises the rate of workplace injuries in the days that follow.
Never before has a public health intervention been blocked so consistently by a second-order political disagreement about implementation.
So deeply embedded is DST in commercial culture that even governments with clear evidence of harm find it politically costly to abolish.
Triggers: Not only · Rarely · Never (before) · So + adj · Not until · Seldom → invert auxiliary + subject
Keep the meaning. Use the structure in brackets.
Use: despite · even though · nevertheless · while · in spite of
Reading
ReadingIn the spring of 1916, Germany moved its clocks forward by one hour to save coal during the First World War. Britain followed days later. The logic was compelling: more usable daylight in the evening meant less need for artificial lighting, and in an era of gas lamps and coal fires, that genuinely meant less fuel. One hundred and ten years later, in an age of LED lighting, always-on data centres and air conditioning that consumes more electricity in warm summer evenings than any lamp saving could offset, it is claimed that the energy argument for Daylight Saving Time has largely collapsed. Yet the clocks still move.
The ecological dimension is equally striking. Migratory birds navigate by photoperiod — the ratio of light to dark — which is entirely unaffected by human clock changes. The result is a growing temporal mismatch between bird arrival dates and the peak emergence of the insects they depend on for food. Farmers, whose livestock operate on solar time regardless of what the clocks say, effectively lose track of time twice a year, spending two weeks per transition aligning their routines with an artificial schedule. Despite these disruptions, the farming lobby has historically been less well-funded than the retail and leisure industries that benefit from extended summer evenings.
The economic picture is mixed. Never before has the misalignment between European and American DST transition dates — which occur on different weekends — created such significant disruption to financial markets. For two weeks each year, trading desks on both sides of the Atlantic operate on schedules that are out of sync in ways that add friction, cost and error to global finance. Against the clock as DST reformers may feel, the political situation is equally discouraging: the EU voted to abolish DST in 2018, but member states have been unable to agree on whether to keep permanent summer time or permanent standard time. In the long run, the scientific evidence strongly favours permanent standard time — the chronobiology is unambiguous. But retail and tourism industries lobby hard for the opposite. And lobbying, not evidence, tends to shape the calendar.
Find one example of each G1–G6 and any three idioms in the article. Write them here.
Write full sentences. Use advanced grammar where possible.
Listening
ListeningThe Clock That Nobody Wanted — Key Points
Find one example of each in the listening. Write the exact words.
Speaking & Writing
SpeakingDiscuss in groups of three or four. Use all six grammar structures, at least four idioms and at least four vocabulary words from Handout 1. The debate has four dimensions — economics, health, nature and society.
G1: "It is reported/claimed that…" · G2: "If… had… might not be…" · G3: "What blocks reform is… / It is not X but Y that…"
G4: "Despite… / Even though… / Nevertheless…" · G5: "It is imperative that… be…" · G6: "Rarely has… / Not only does…"
Idioms: out of sync · turn back the clock · in the long run · burn the candle at both ends · against the clock · lose track of time
Option A — Opinion Essay B2–C1: "Daylight Saving Time should be abolished permanently. Discuss." Use evidence from the lesson and at least two idioms naturally in the text.
Option B — Position Paper C1–C2: Draft a brief position paper for a European public health authority arguing that permanent standard time — not permanent summer time — should be adopted across the EU. Address the retail industry's counterarguments and the coordination problem.
Option C — Analytical Essay C2: "The debate about Daylight Saving Time is not really about time — it is about whose interests governments choose to represent. Analyse." Draw on evidence from all four domains: economics, health, nature and society.
Word count: 120–150 words
G1 Passive Rep G2 Mixed Cond G3 Cleft G4 Concession G5 Subjunctive G6 Inversion 3 Idioms
"It is reported that cardiac events rise 24%… [G1] / If DST had been abolished in the 1980s, health costs might not be… [G2]"
"It is not energy saving but lobbying that keeps DST alive / What the evidence shows is… [G3] / Despite the EU vote… [G4]"
"It is imperative that transition be coordinated… [G5] / Rarely has a policy outlived its purpose so completely… [G6]"

