At B1–B2, students can engage with a more sophisticated argument than the simple analogy used in Lesson 3A. The key distinction to draw:
Research says: Studies have shown that homework in academic subjects — maths, history, science — has mixed or limited benefits, especially for younger students. More homework does not automatically mean better results.
But language is different: English is a skill, not a subject. The research that questions homework is mostly about knowledge-based subjects. Language acquisition requires repeated exposure and active use. Every conversation, every film, every song in English is practice. This is not "homework" in the traditional sense — it is training time.
The argument students should arrive at: We should not do English practice because teachers tell us to. We should do it because every hour of exposure makes the language more automatic, more natural, more ours. The lesson does not tell students this — it leads them there through the debate and discussion tasks.
Board this at the end (after H5 Task C): "There is a difference between homework as obligation and practice as skill-building. Which one is English?"
Finnish education — key facts:
· Finnish children do not start school until age 7 (vs age 5 in the UK, age 6 in many countries).
· Finland gives very little homework — sometimes none until secondary school.
· Finnish schools do not rank students or use standardised tests until age 16.
· Finland consistently scores near the top of the PISA rankings (international education assessment).
· Finnish students report higher well-being and lower stress than students in many other countries.
The homework debate — key findings:
· A 2006 study by Harris Cooper (Duke University) found that homework has little effect on primary school achievement and a modest effect for secondary students.
· The OECD found no relationship between the amount of homework and PISA scores across countries.
· However, independent reading and self-directed study in languages and arts show clear benefits.
Note on language learning specifically: The research that questions homework value generally applies to knowledge-based subjects. Language acquisition research (Krashen, Dörnyei) strongly supports the value of extensive exposure and autonomous practice outside the classroom.
At B1–B2, the Present Perfect is natural in the context of research and change:
Researchers have found that… · Schools have become more competitive. · Finland has shown that…
Studies have not proved that homework helps all students.
Has the education system changed? · How long have Finnish schools used this approach?
The key contrast at B1–B2: Present Perfect vs Past Simple
PP = relevant to now, ongoing relevance: "Researchers have shown that…"
PS = finished, specific time: "Finland introduced this system in the 1970s."
The passive is natural for describing educational systems:
Students are tested constantly. · Homework is given every evening. · Creativity is not valued enough.
Children are encouraged to play. · Schools have been ranked by exam results.
Common error: ✗ "Students are test constantly." → ✓ "Students are tested." (to be + past participle)
Should = recommendation / opinion: "Schools should focus on well-being."
Must = strong obligation or logical necessity: "Students must have time to play."
Might = possibility, hedging: "Homework might help some students."
Shouldn't = negative recommendation: "Exams shouldn't be the only measure."
· ★ G1 Present Perfect: Research has shown / Finnish schools have proved / Their students have been given / The evidence has suggested / research has linked / homework is not set / it has always been done
· G2 Passive: Students are often given homework / it has been shown / homework is not set / tasks are assigned / students are constantly being assessed / it has always been done that way / it has been assigned
· G3 Should/Might/Must: schools should focus / Students should be encouraged / Schools must take / Exam results and well-being don't have to be opposites / schools should focus on teaching
Ex 2 (PP negative + question): 1. haven't found / Have researchers found? 2. hasn't improved / Has well-being improved? 3. haven't changed / Have Finnish schools changed? 4. hasn't been shown / Has it been shown?
Ex 3 (Passive): 1. are tested 2. is given 3. are encouraged 4. is not valued / isn't valued 5. have been ranked 6. are assessed 7. should be taught
Ex 4 (PP vs PS): 1. introduced (PS — specific year) 2. has shown (PP — relevant now, no time) 3. scored (PS — specific time "last year") 4. have become (PP — change up to now) 5. published (PS — specific year) 6. have not improved (PP — up to now, result matters now)
Ex 5 (Should/Might/Must): 1. should reduce 2. might help 3. must take / should take 4. shouldn't be 5. might not need 6. should be taught
Ex 6 (error correction): 1. have SHOWN (not 'have show') 2. Students ARE ASSESSED (not 'are assess') 3. Schools SHOULD FOCUS (not 'should focuses') 4. Homework HAS BEEN given (passive PP) 5. MIGHT help (not 'mights help') 6. have NOT been shown / haven't been shown (negative passive PP)
Listening Task 2: Research has shown / Finnish schools proved / students given less homework / quality matters more / constantly being assessed / anxiety burnout mental health / language is a skill / films music conversations reading / training not homework / makes you better / not assigned
Is School Working?
Vocabulary
VocabularyMatch each word to its definition.
→ _______________
→ _______________
→ _______________
→ _______________
→ _______________
→ _______________
Use the words from Part A.
Answer key
Grammar
GrammarUse the Present Perfect for research findings and changes that are relevant now — no specific time mentioned.
Research has shown that… · Studies have found that… · Schools have become more competitive.
Finland has proved that less homework can work. · This approach has not been tested widely.
Has the education system changed? · How long have Finnish schools used this method?
PP vs Past Simple — the key contrast:
"Researchers have shown that homework has limited value." (PP — still relevant today)
"Finland introduced this reform in the 1970s." (PS — specific finished time)
Signal words for PP: recently · for years · so far · yet · already · never · ever · since · always
Signal words for PS: in [year] · ago · last year · at that time · when + past event
Use the passive when the action matters more than who does it — common in academic and formal writing.
Active → Passive:
"Schools test students constantly." → "Students are tested constantly."
"Teachers give homework every day." → "Homework is given every day."
Past passive: "This system was introduced in the 1970s."
PP passive: "Students have been ranked by exam results for decades."
Modal passive: "Students should be encouraged to think independently."
Form: be (in the right tense) + past participle
✗ "Students are test." ✓ "Students are tested."
For recommendations, possibilities and obligations in the education debate.
SHOULD — recommendation or opinion:
"Schools should focus on well-being." · "Students shouldn't be ranked."
MUST — strong necessity or logical conclusion:
"Schools must take mental health seriously." · "There must be a better way."
MIGHT — possibility, hedging an argument:
"Less homework might reduce stress." · "This approach might not work in all cultures."
All three: modal + base infinitive (no -s, no -ing, no -ed)
✗ "Schools should focuses." ✓ "Schools should focus."
Complete using the Present Perfect of the verb in brackets.
Write the negative form and a question for each sentence.
Negative: ___________________________ Question: ___________________________
Negative: ___________________________ Question: ___________________________
Negative: ___________________________ Question: ___________________________
Negative: ___________________________ Question: ___________________________
Rewrite each sentence using the passive. You do not need to mention who does the action.
Choose the correct tense. Think: is there a specific time (PS) or is it relevant now with no time (PP)?
Complete with should / shouldn't / might / must and the correct verb form.
Each sentence has one grammar mistake. Find it and correct it.
Answer key
Ex 2 (PP negative + question): 1. haven't found / Have researchers found? 2. hasn't improved / Has well-being improved? 3. haven't changed / Have Finnish schools changed? 4. hasn't been shown / Has it been shown?
Ex 3 (Passive): 1. are tested 2. is given 3. are encouraged 4. is not valued / isn't valued 5. have been ranked 6. are assessed 7. should be taught
Ex 4 (PP vs PS): 1. introduced (PS — specific year) 2. has shown (PP — relevant now, no time) 3. scored (PS — specific time "last year") 4. have become (PP — change up to now) 5. published (PS — specific year) 6. have not improved (PP — up to now, result matters now)
Ex 5 (Should/Might/Must): 1. should reduce 2. might help 3. must take / should take 4. shouldn't be 5. might not need 6. should be taught
Ex 6 (error correction): 1. have SHOWN (not 'have show') 2. Students ARE ASSESSED (not 'are assess') 3. Schools SHOULD FOCUS (not 'should focuses') 4. Homework HAS BEEN given (passive PP) 5. MIGHT help (not 'mights help') 6. have NOT been shown / haven't been shown (negative passive PP)
Listening Task 2: Research has shown / Finnish schools proved / students given less homework / quality matters more / constantly being assessed / anxiety burnout mental health / language is a skill / films music conversations reading / training not homework / makes you better / not assigned
Reading
ReadingIn Finland, children do not start school until the age of seven — two years later than in the United Kingdom. In the early years, play is considered essential. Children are not assessed through formal tests. Instead, they are encouraged to explore, create and collaborate. Research has consistently supported this approach: early play has been linked to better social skills, stronger creativity and higher motivation to learn in later years.
Finnish students are given far less homework than students in most other countries. A major international study found that the amount of homework assigned to students has no consistent relationship with their academic achievement. In Finland, homework has been kept to a minimum, particularly in primary school. The focus is on quality of learning during school hours — not quantity of work outside them.
Critics argue that this approach might not transfer to other cultures. Not all educational systems are equally well-funded, and teacher quality varies significantly between countries. However, the evidence has not supported the idea that more homework always means better results. Some researchers have suggested that the pressure of constant homework might actually reduce students' enjoyment of learning over time.
In many countries, students are assessed constantly — through standardised tests, national exams and continuous coursework. Research has linked high levels of exam pressure to anxiety, sleep problems and reduced well-being in teenagers. In Finland, students are not ranked against each other, and national standardised testing does not begin until the age of sixteen. Schools are expected to support the whole student — not just their exam results.
The Finnish model has attracted enormous attention from educators worldwide. Several countries have introduced reforms inspired by Finland — reducing homework, increasing play time and focusing more on well-being. The evidence has not suggested that this makes students less academically successful. In fact, a growing body of research has indicated the opposite: students who enjoy school and feel supported tend to perform better in the long run.
There is no single solution. But the Finnish experience has shown something important: the way a school treats its students matters — not just what it teaches them.
Write complete sentences using evidence from the article.
Go back to the article. Find two examples of each grammar structure.
Listening
ListeningMia's Main Points 📝
Listen again. Find one example of each structure from the conversation.
Speaking
SpeakingWork in pairs or groups. One person argues FOR the statement. The other argues AGAINST. Use evidence from the reading and listening. Use Present Perfect, passive and should/might/must.
For: Evidence has shown limited benefits / Well-being matters / Finland has proved it works
Against: Structure is needed / Not all students are self-motivated / Different cultures require different methods
For: Fair / Clear standard / Universities need grades
Against: Pressure / Creativity not assessed / Well-being is harmed / Better methods exist
For: Results speak for themselves / Well-being improved / Reform is needed
Against: Different cultures / Different funding / Can't simply transfer a system
"Research has shown that…" · "Evidence suggests that…" · "Schools should / must / might…"
"This approach has been shown to…" · "Students are often assessed through…"
"I agree that… however…" · "That might be true, but…"
Work in groups. Design three reforms for your school. What should change? Use should/must/might and the passive. Present your ideas to the class.
Reform 2: Homework should / must _______________________________________________
Reform 3: Students should be encouraged to _______________________________________________
Mia makes an important distinction at the end of the podcast. Discuss these questions in groups.
Writing
WritingOption A: "Schools should ban homework for students under 14." Do you agree? Use evidence from the lesson to support your argument. Mention at least one counter-argument.
Option B: Describe how school should change in your country. What reforms should be introduced? What should be done differently? Use evidence where possible.
Option C: Mia argues that language practice is different from other homework. Do you agree with her distinction? Is English practice "homework" or "training"? Explain your view.
Word count: 100–120 words
★ Present Perfect Passive Voice Should / Might / Must
"Research has shown that…" · "Evidence has suggested that…" · "Students are tested / assessed / encouraged…"
"Schools should / must / might…" · "This approach has been shown to…"
"I agree that… however…" · "There is a difference between… and…"

